COA backs CMS plan to cut 340B hospital drug margins
The Community Oncology Alliance is urging CMS to finalize 2027 Medicare outpatient payment reforms that would lower reimbursement for 340B-acquired drugs, expand site-neutral payments and tighten hospital price transparency. The group says the changes would reduce patient cost-sharing and redirect Medicare dollars toward smaller, rural and community hospitals.
Why it matters: - COA says the 2027 OPPS proposal could reduce inflated Medicare payments for drugs hospitals buy through the 340B program. - The group argues the changes could lower beneficiary cost sharing and shift Medicare dollars toward smaller hospitals, rural facilities and community oncology settings. - COA also sees stronger hospital price transparency as a practical step for cancer patients trying to compare costs.
What happened: - The Community Oncology Alliance submitted comments to CMS on the Calendar Year 2027 Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System proposed rule. - COA backed CMS’ proposal to rebalance payment for 340B-acquired drugs. - COA also urged CMS to expand clinically appropriate site-neutral payment and strengthen hospital price transparency requirements. - The group posted the full comment letter.
The details: - Under CMS’ proposed 340B policy, hospitals would be paid Average Sales Price minus 33.4% for 340B-acquired drugs. - CMS based the proposed rate on its 2026 hospital acquisition-cost survey. - Hospitals currently receive Average Sales Price plus 6%, even when they buy drugs at steep 340B discounts. - COA said that structure lets some large, high-volume hospital systems keep substantial margins between acquisition cost and Medicare reimbursement. - COA said the new approach would better align payment with actual hospital drug costs. - COA said the policy would also reduce cost sharing for Medicare beneficiaries. - Avalere analysis cited by COA found that 78% of OPPS hospitals would receive a net payment increase because of budget neutrality. - The same analysis found rural hospitals would see an average increase of 3.4%. - Hospitals with fewer than 100 beds would see an average increase of 7.0%. - COA supports ASP minus 33.4% with no add-on payment for 2027 and future years. - COA also supports a targeted exemption for rural, sole community hospitals because of their access and financial constraints. - On site-neutral payment, COA supports Physician-Fee-Schedule-equivalent rates for imaging without contrast in excepted off-campus hospital departments. - COA urged CMS to identify additional services and locations that could be paid at aligned rates, with rural and access safeguards. - On transparency, COA wants standardized payer and plan identifiers. - COA also wants structured reporting in a common downloadable shoppable-services file for every hospital. - COA asked CMS to add infusion administration, PET/CT imaging and tumor genomic-sequencing panels to the shoppable-services list. - Ted Okon, COA executive director, said seniors should not pay cost sharing based on inflated drug reimbursement when hospitals buy drugs at steep discounts. - Debra Patt, MD, PhD, MBA, FASCO, COA president, said affordability, access and information all matter for people facing cancer.
Between the lines: - COA is backing CMS on 340B reform, but it is also trying to preserve access protections for rural and sole community hospitals. - The group’s position reflects a broader push to move Medicare payments closer to actual acquisition costs and away from hospital system cross-subsidies. - The transparency request suggests COA wants patients to see more usable price data for high-cost cancer services, not just comply with disclosure rules on paper.
What's next: - CMS will decide whether to finalize the 340B payment change in the final 2027 OPPS rule. - COA wants CMS to keep advancing site-neutral payment policies and broaden them to additional services where clinically appropriate. - COA is pressing for stronger hospital price transparency requirements in the final rule. - The group thanked CMS for addressing what it called longstanding structural problems in hospital payment and urged the agency to move quickly.
Disclaimer: This article was produced by AGP Wire with the assistance of artificial intelligence based on original source content and has been refined to improve clarity, structure, and readability. This content is provided on an “as is” basis. While care has been taken in its preparation, it may contain inaccuracies or omissions, and readers should consult the original source and independently verify key information where appropriate. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, investment, or other professional advice.
Sign up for:
Healthcare Online Network
The daily local news briefing you can trust. Every day. Subscribe now.
Check Your Email!
We sent a one-time activation link to: .
Confirm it's you by clicking the email link.
If the email is not in your inbox, check spam or try again.
Welcome back!
is already signed up. Check your inbox for updates.